1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 169,213,323; (b) KRW 3,00,000; and (c) KRW 1,00,000,00 for the Plaintiff C, D, E, and F, respectively; and (c) the Defendant.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. At around 07:35 on April 11, 201, G is deemed as the Defendant’s vehicle (hereinafter “Defendant’s vehicle”).

) Under the 2 cycle in which the wall and vibration located in Gwangju Seo-gu, where the vehicle driving along the intersection is proceeding to the west-gu road facing the intersection, and when a bicycle passes the bicycle crosswalk, the bicycle crosswalk should temporarily stop in front of the bicycle crosswalk so as not to obstruct or endanger the passage of the bicycle (see Article 15-2(3) of the Road Traffic Act), despite the negligence of violating this provision (see Article 15-2(3) of the Road Traffic Act), and the Plaintiff’s bicycle crosswalk crossing the bicycle crosswalk to the right side of the Defendant’s bicycle crossing to the right side of the Defendant’s bicycle crossing to the front side of the Defendant’s vehicle, and thereby, the said Plaintiff was injured by the Defendant’s front side of the Defendant’s bicycle. (hereinafter “instant accident”).

(2) Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C is the mother of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff D, E, and F are the children of Plaintiff A.

3) The defendant is an insurer which has entered into an automobile comprehensive insurance contract with respect to the defendant vehicle. [Grounds for recognition] The defendant does not have dispute, and each entry in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 3, and 7 (including paper numbers, and the purport of the whole pleadings)

B. According to the above fact of recognition of liability, the defendant is liable for damages suffered by the plaintiff A due to the accident of this case as the insurer of the defendant vehicle.

C. Limit of liability, however, since the place of this case is a bicycle crosswalk without signal apparatus, the plaintiff A also has a duty to ensure the safety of his own by checking well whether there is a vehicle being driven on on the bicycle, and considering the aspect that the damage is fair sharing, it is reasonable to limit the defendant's responsibility to 80%.

(2) Except as otherwise stated below within the scope of liability for damages, the attached Table 1 calculation table shall be respectively attached.