The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. In full view of the following facts: (a) In this case, the Defendant’s act of sexual abuse at the same time committed an indecent act against the victim’s father as his father, and at the same time committed the victim’s sexual intercourse; and (b) the crime of this case appears to have a negative impact on the victim’s psychological growth and the formation of sexual identity; and (c) considering all the factors favorable to the Defendant, among various sentencing factors, such as the Defendant’s agreement with the victim’s mother, and the Defendant’s initial crime with no criminal history, the Defendant’s punishment cannot be deemed to have exceeded the reasonable scope of discretion by excessively neglecting the Defendant’s punishment.

Defendant’s assertion that the sentence of the court below is unreasonable is rejected.

2. Conclusion, the Defendant’s appeal is dismissed for lack of grounds.