Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is engaged in the duty of driving B rocketing taxi.

On October 11, 2019, the Defendant driven the above vehicle at a speed of 17:20, the Defendant proceeded directly at a speed of the city, depending on three-lanes among five-lanes, namely, the intersection of the shooting distance in front of the Yanananan-dong, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-gu, Seoan-do.

Since the intersection has a signal apparatus, in such cases, a person driving a motor vehicle has a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving the right and the right according to the protection of the front side and driving the motor vehicle safely.

Nevertheless, even if the defendant neglected this and neglected it, the defendant got the front part of the D-wheeled Vehicle driven by the victim C(the age of 40) who was in accordance with the new subparagraph on the left side of the defendant's proceeding, and suffered approximately four weeks of treatment to the victim, such as the upper part of the D-wheeled Vehicle, which was driven by the victim C(the age of 40).

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The actual survey report and the report on the occurrence of traffic accidents;

1. On-site photographs of the accident site and black boxes of vehicles;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of a medical certificate;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) and Article 3 (1) 1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order led to the instant traffic accident while the Defendant was in a direct position in violation of the signal, and the Defendant’s negligence is serious, and the degree of injury to the victim cannot be deemed to be less than that of the victim. The Defendant has two times previous departments, and even if he was punished by violating the signal, it is disadvantageous that the instant accident was caused by violating the signal even eight months prior to the occurrence of the traffic accident.

(b).