logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2016.09.01 2015가합569402
총회결의무효확인등
Text

1. The plaintiff A's lawsuit shall be dismissed.

2. Upon the request of the Plaintiff B and C, the Defendant is at an extraordinary general meeting on December 29, 2014.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The defendant is an incorporated association established for the purpose of promoting national culture and cultivating sound national sentiments through the music activities centered on I and J, etc.

B) On February 26, 2014, Plaintiff A was elected as the president at the resolution of the general meeting of the Defendant on February 26, 2014, Plaintiff B was the president of the petition branch of the Defendant, Plaintiff C was the president of the branch of the Defendant’s petition, and Plaintiff C was the president of the Defendant’s top priority branch of the branch.

The parts related to this case among the defendant's articles of incorporation and the detailed rules of operation shall be as specified in the attached Form.

B. On July 16, 2007, the Defendant made a resolution to appoint K as the president and 49 vice-president or directors at an ordinary general meeting of shareholders, including L, etc. Accordingly, the Defendant filed a lawsuit against the Defendant to nullify the above resolution under Seoul Central District Court 2010 Gahap9400, and on July 1, 2010, the above court rendered a judgment against the Plaintiff that the above resolution is valid. M (Appointed) appealed appealed (Seoul High Court 2010Na73965). On October 21, 2010, the above court rejected the appeal (Seoul High Court 2010Na73965). On the grounds that there were serious defects in the procedure of a resolution to appoint 49 vice-president or directors from the above ordinary general meeting of shareholders, the resolution to appoint K as the president of the ordinary general meeting of shareholders was valid, and the remaining resolution was rejected by the Defendant’s final and conclusive judgment against the Defendant’s 2010Ga1531, supra.

arrow