A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Punishment of the crime

On September 30, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to a summary order of KRW 3,00,00 as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving), and on June 12, 2015, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for one year and two years of suspended execution due to a violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes (dive Vehicles) and a violation of the Road Traffic Act (drinking driving) in the field support of the Chuncheon District Court on June 12, 2015, and the said judgment was finalized on June 20, 2015, and was in violation of Article 44(1) of the Road Traffic Act at least twice as of June 20, 2015.

On December 15, 2016, at around 02:45, the Defendant driven a BSP car without a driver’s license, while under the influence of alcohol content 0.075% in the blood while driving a 5km car in the direction of the office, where the Defendant is under the influence of alcohol content 0.075% from the front of the office of the cafeteria to the front of the office of the cafeteria located in the same gate, a mutually adjacent to the jun-ri rith rith rith rith rith rith rith.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Notification of the results of regulating the driving of drinking, the situation report on the driver of drinking, and the register of driver's licenses;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Application of a reply to inquiry, such as criminal history, investigation report (verification of the history of drinking driving and confirmation of crimes during the period of suspended execution);

1. Article 148-2 (1) 1 and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act concerning facts constituting an offense; Article 152 subparagraph 1 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving)

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each sentence of imprisonment;

1. In light of the fact that the defendant committed the instant crime even during the period of suspended execution, it is necessary to strictly punish the defendant in light of the reasons for sentencing under Articles 53 and 55(1)3 of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., favorable circumstances among the reasons for sentencing), and that the defendant committed the instant crime.

However, the defendant recognized all of the crimes of this case and reflected the mistake, and the age, sex, environment of the defendant;