The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a doctor of “C” in Gwangjin-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, and was unable to prepare and issue a prescription without having a doctor or a doctor who directly conducted a medical examination. However, the Defendant issued a prescription through E without directly examining the patient’s child, in total on 11 October 201, 2012;

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Accusation against medical persons violating the Medical Service Act;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to outpatient treatment records and prescriptions;

1. Relevant provisions of the Acts concerning criminal facts and Articles 89 and 17 (1) of the Medical Service Act for the selection of punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Penalty fine of 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won a day);

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act of the suspended sentence (Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (Article 59 (1) of the same Act (Article 59 (1) of the same Act (Article 59 (1) of the same Act is deemed to have suffered considerable mental damage upon unfair request from E even if the defendant committed this case in good faith for a patient with severe dementia who is his/her child