The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the grounds of appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is contrary to all of the crimes of this case, and the defendant deposited KRW 300,000 for the victim D of the crime of interference with business when it comes to the trial. However, even though the defendant had several same criminal records, he/she again committed the crimes of this case during the repeated crime period despite the fact that he/she did not reach an agreement with the victims, and all of the sentencing conditions such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, living environment, family relationship, motive, means, and consequence, it cannot be deemed that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided

[However, in accordance with Article 25 of the Regulation on Criminal Procedure, Article 314 (1) (Interference with Business) of the Criminal Act is "Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act", "Article 35 of the Criminal Act" in Article 35 of the Criminal Act shall be "Article 37, the former part of Article 38 (1) 2, Article 50 of the Criminal Act shall be "Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, Article 50 of the Criminal Act shall be "Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, Article 50 of the Criminal Act shall be "Article 4 of the Criminal Act", "Article 35 of the Criminal Act shall be "Article 37, Article 38 (1) 2, Article 50 of the Criminal Act shall be applicable to the crimes of Violence, etc. (the proviso to Article 42 of the Criminal Act shall be applicable to the crimes of violence, etc.)" in Article 34 of the Criminal Act.