logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2018.01.17 2017고단3237
사행행위등규제및처벌특례법위반등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for not more than ten months.

Seized evidence No. 1 shall be forfeited from the defendant.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

피고인은 2017. 10. 5. 경부터 2017. 10. 13. 18:05 경까지 성남시 중원구 B 지하 1 층에서, 등급을 받지 아니한 빠찡 코 게임기 22대를 설치한 후, 그 곳을 찾는 손님들 로 하여금 현금 3만원 당 게임 코인 270개를 구입하게 하여 위 빠찡 코 게임기를 이용할 수 있도록 하였다.

위 빠찡 코 게임기는 게임기에 게임 코인 3개를 투입한 후 버튼을 눌러 게임기 화면의 그림을 회전시키고, 우연히 상하, 좌우 또는 대각선으로 같은 그림 3개가 일치하여 당첨되면 당첨 점수대로 게임 코 인이 배출되어 이를 획득하는 게임기로 사행성 유기기구이다.

The defendant received a demand from customers who have finished a game for money exchange and exchanged 4.50 won by converting the game co-owners into 50,000 won, and 90,000 won by adding 10,000 won to the game co-owners.

As a result, the defendant provided game water that was not rated, exchanged the results obtained through the use of game water, and conducted speculative activities using speculative gaming machines as a business.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against C;

1. Each statement of D, E, F, and G;

1. A protocol of seizure and a list of seizure;

1. Application of 16 copies of photographs of seized articles, 15 copies of photographs, and one copy of a monthly rent contract; and

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning criminal facts, Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)1 (the point of providing game products not classified) of the Act on the Promotion of Alternative Game Industry, and Article 30(1)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning Regulation and Punishment of Speculative Acts, Etc. (the point of engaging in speculative business using speculative instruments), Articles 44(1)2 and 32(1)7 of the Game Industry Promotion Act (the point of providing game products exchange business) concerning criminal facts, and choice of imprisonment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Reasons for the sentencing of Article 44(2) of the Confiscation Industry Promotion Act

arrow