The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal did not assault the police officer dispatched by the defendant, and even if so, the police officer was assaulted.

Even if this is a police officer's act of self-defense to arrest the defendant, and even if the defendant did not have any intention to obstruct the performance of official duties, the court below convicted the defendant by misunderstanding the fact.

2. 판단 원심이 적법하게 채택하여 조사한 증거들에 의하여 인정되는 다음과 같은 사정, 즉 피고인이 해양경찰청에 대한 국정감사를 마치고 회식을 하면서 술을 마신 후 귀가하다가 자신의 주거지 근처 벤치에 누워 있는 것을 본 경비원이 피고인을 깨우자 피고인이 경비원을 발로 걷어찼고 이에 경비원이 112신고를 하여 2명의 경찰관이 출동하였는데, 경찰관들이 피고인에게 귀가를 권유하였으나 피고인은 경찰관 중 한명에게 욕설을 하면서 발길질을 하고 그의 얼굴을 때린 점, 당시 경찰관들은 경찰제복을 입은 상태에서 피고인에게 자신들이 E지구대 소속 경찰관임을 밝혔으므로 피고인이 술에 취한 상태였다

Even if the other party recognizes the fact that he was a police officer, and in light of the fact that two police officers request support from other patrols because police officers failed to control the defendant, and they were additionally called to the scene and arrested the defendant, it seems that the resistance of the defendant was very serious at the time. Although the defendant argued that his act was an act of self-defense, the defendant's act of self-defense, but the police officer recommended the defendant to return home to the defendant, and the defendant's act of unsatisfying the defendant, which was committed by the police officer, cannot be evaluated as a defensive act, such as the defendant's act of satching the defendant, by falling off the ground at the time of his satching.

even though the defendant is.