The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged:

A. On September 13:00 on September 7, 2013, the facts in the Nam-gu Incheon Metropolitan City City City City Park Park Dempi refer to the victim on the job with approximately 20-30 persons in childbeds, although the victim did not engage in sexual traffic with money received from the victim D, and the victim refers to the victim on the job with approximately 20-30 persons in childbeds, and “low females are women who face their body, who are receiving KRW 200,000,000 and take the job of sexual traffic at the low-income female house.”

B. Around 13:00 on September 14, 2013, a fact at the above place refers to the victim at the place where approximately 20-30 persons are located in the above park, although there was no fact that the victim received money and engaged in commercial sex acts, the victim refers to the victim at the place where approximately 20-30 persons are located in the above park, and “low females are less than gents, and they are several males. The male and females are gents. The body of the person who received the money, and is bad in receiving the money.”

C. Around 13:00 on September 21, 2013, the facts at the above location are as follows: (a) regardless of the fact that the victim received money and engaged in sexual traffic, the victim was released from the place where approximately 20-30 persons are fluent in the above park; and (b) “low females are fluent; fluent females are fluent, females are fluent, and their body are fluent.”

D. On September 28, 2013, the facts at the above location were around 12:30 on September 28, 2013: (a) although there was no fact that the victim received money from the victim and engaged in commercial sex acts, the victim was released from the place where approximately 20-30 persons are responsible in the above park; and (b) “low females are females who are suffering from 200,000 won, and do not engage in commercial sex acts; (c) the body is frighted; (d) the victim’s reputation was damaged by publicly alleging each false fact.”

2. The facts charged of the instant case are crimes falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312(2) of the same Act. The victim expressed his wish to punish the Defendant after the institution of the instant indictment.