logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2013.10.01 2013고단893
절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On June 11, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for special larceny for six months in the Suwon District Court, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on June 19, 2013.

1. From May 19, 2013, the Defendant: (a) around 21:30 on May 19, 2013, the victim D, parked on a road in front of the Manyang-gu, Mayang-si, the Defendant: (b) laid the cresh of the window in which the window of the EPa vehicle was opened in another window; (c) removed the correction device; (d) turned the cresh into the driver’s seat; and (d) cut off the kid-dong and driven by driving it.

2. On May 19, 2013, the Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act (unlicensed Driving) from May 19, 2013 to May 19, 2013, 2013, the Defendant driven an EP car without a vehicle driver’s license in the section of approximately 9 km from the street in front of the Mayang-gu, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si, Sinpo-si.

5. By December 25, 25, he/she was driving with no license on seven occasions in total on a day-to-day basis, such as Anyang, Kunn, Balkdo, Balkdo, and Chungcheongbuk.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of D police statement;

1. Registers of driver's licenses;

1. Previous convictions in judgment: Criminal records, previous records of disposition and report on results of confirmation, investigation reports (applicable to cases of special larceny A by suspect and attachment of judgment) and statutes;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act, the choice of punishment for the crime, Article 329 of the Criminal Act, Article 152 subparagraph 1 of the Road Traffic Act, Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act, and the choice of imprisonment, respectively;

1. The latter part of Article 37 and Article 39 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning concurrent crimes;

1. Since the reason for sentencing under the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2, and Article 50 of the Criminal Act among concurrent offenders committed the crime of this case in the course of the investigation and trial for the same kind of crime, the defendant cannot be sentenced to a punishment corresponding to that for the crime of this case.

However, there are some circumstances that reflect the defendant's mistake in depth and the circumstances leading to the crime are somewhat considered.

arrow