logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.02.09 2016고단3677
무고
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not more than ten months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Since about ten years ago since the defendant had been living without a certain occupation and filed various claims for disclosure of information with respect to taxi companies in Daegu Metropolitan City Construction and Transportation Bureau C, however, public officials belonging to the above C filed a lawsuit against the above D on or around May 11, 2015, claiming damages against the above D on the ground of the infringement of personal information against part of the defendant's claim for disclosure of information claimed by the defendant. On or around December 9, 2015, the defendant lost the above claim for damages, and the defendant prepared a complaint with the following contents in order to have the above D punished.

On January 27, 2016, the Defendant: (a) prepared a complaint stating that “The notice of the decision on disclosure of information No. 3 of this case submitted by the Defendant D to the Panel of the Daegu District Court 2015 Ghana 27485, which was requested by the complainant, by means of a factual inquiry to the Defendant’s residence; (b) the notice of the decision on disclosure of information of this case (FEM: the current status of monthly transportation workers; hereinafter “the notice of the decision on disclosure of information of this case”) was prepared by arbitrarily taking advantage of the name of G who is a public official in charge of the Defendant’s lawsuit, and, (c) the Defendant’s complaint was prepared on February 23, 2016, with the investigation of the Nam-gu Police Station and the supplementary statement conducted by the Intelligent 1 Team office, “The notice of the decision on the disclosure of information of this case submitted by the Defendant to the Panel of the Defendant was forged and falsified; and (d) the public official seal No. 2 of this case and the list No. 4 (hereinafter “No. 5”).”

arrow