The judgment of the court below is reversed.

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for twenty-five years.

One kitchen (No. 1), one kitchen which has been seized, and L.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. The sentence of the lower court (30 years of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

B. The Prosecutor’s sentence of the lower court is too uneasible and unreasonable.

2. As the assault case occurred due to the monetary problem lent to the victims, the defendant was investigated by the police after being examined by the police, and was found in the victim's residence, killed with knife several kitchens prepared in advance with the victim D, tried to kill the victim C, and destroyed the victim's residence.

In light of the circumstances, methods, results, etc. of such crime, the liability of the crime is very heavy.

I would like to say.

In particular, murder is an act infringing upon the life of a person who is a dignity and is an act of infringing on the life of a person, and it is a serious crime which cannot be absolutely acceptable for any defense, and the crime of murder and attempted murder of this case is a failed crime which causes uncompeting among family members, since the defendant committed the crime of murder of this case and attempted murder of this case.

The crime of fire prevention is a crime detrimental to public safety and peace, and is a very dangerous criminal that is likely to cause a high number of life and property, and thus, it is highly dangerous to the society. As such, part of the occupants of the apartment due to the fire prevention crime by the defendant, who received treatment from the Maitius hospital, and the degree of the fire of the apartment is heavy.

Victim D seems to have flickly killed with extreme pain, and it seems that Victim D's bereaved families, including Victim C, live in an irrecoverable mental suffering.

The defendant was unable to receive a letter from the bereaved family members C and D of the victim.

These points are disadvantageous to the defendant.

On the other hand, the defendant recognizes all of the crimes of this case and reflects his mistake.