1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1...

1. Basic facts

A. With respect to A bus vehicles (hereinafter “Plaintiffs”), the Defendant is an insurance company that concluded each automobile insurance contract with respect to B passenger vehicles (hereinafter “Defendant vehicles”).

B. On January 9, 2015, around 11:37, at the two-lanes of the flow distance of the Gongnung-dong, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Nowon-gu, the vehicle immediately behind the vehicle was waiting for left-hand turn.

Afterward, according to the left-hand turn to the left-hand turn, the defendant vehicle entered the two-lanes to the left-hand side, and the plaintiff vehicle entered the three-lanes to the left-hand side. The defendant vehicle was changed from the two-lanes to the three-lanes to the third-lanes, and the plaintiff vehicle intended to enter the vehicle was rapid, and as a result, C, which was in the seat for the passenger of the plaintiff vehicle at the time of leaving the bus ahead of the bus.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). As a result, C suffered from the injury of “the plehion of the plehion of the upper and the upper part’s plehion.”

C. As to the instant accident, the Plaintiff paid C totaling KRW 1,744,500 insurance proceeds from January 27, 2015 to March 5, 2015 (i.e., KRW 544,500,000,000,000).

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there has been no dispute, each entry and video of Gap's evidence Nos. 1 through 5, and purport of whole pleading

2. The parties' assertion;

A. The Plaintiff’s assertion that the instant accident took place without properly examining the Plaintiff’s vehicle following the Defendant’s vehicle after the left-hand turn at the intersection, and without using the direction direction, etc., while neglecting the negligence of the Defendant vehicle and the duty of front-handing and front-handing.

It is reasonable to view the negligence ratio of the driver of the defendant vehicle as 70%. It is reasonable to view that the negligence ratio of the driver of the vehicle is 70%.

Therefore, the defendant, the insurer of the defendant vehicle, is the plaintiff who subrogatedly acquired C's damage claim = KRW 1,221,150 of the amount of damage = the plaintiff.