1. The Defendant: (a) from January 17, 2015 to January 17, 2015, the entire three floors of the building indicated in the separate sheet from the Plaintiffs; (b) 2,300,000 square meters.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiffs, the co-owners of the buildings listed in the attached list (hereinafter “instant building”) are the instant lease agreement with the Defendant around March 19, 2012, with the content that the lease deposit is KRW 10 million for the entire three floors of the said building, KRW 60,000 per month, KRW 30,000 per month for rent, management expenses, monthly management expenses, and April 16, 2014 as of April 16, 2014.

A) Around that time, the Defendant entered into a lease deposit of KRW 10 million and received the deposit money from the Defendant, and then delivered the entire three floors of the above building to the Defendant. (B) The Plaintiffs, on May 3, 2012, connected the Defendant on the first floor of the instant building, in sequence with each of the items indicated in the annexed drawing Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 1 (in addition to the entire three floors of the instant building of KRW 33 square meters or less, hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant leased buildings”).

A. With respect to B, without a deposit for lease, the lease agreement of this case is defined as "the second lease agreement of this case" and "the lease agreement of this case in combination with the first lease agreement of this case", and "the lease agreement of this case" of this case is defined as "the lease contract of this case of this case" of this case.

(C) Around that time, the Defendant concluded a contract and delivered the above building parts to the Defendant. From June 2014, the Defendant did not pay monthly rent and management expenses. D. The Plaintiffs expressed their intent to terminate each of the instant lease agreements on the grounds of delinquency, such as monthly rent, etc. by serving the duplicate of the complaint in the instant case. The Plaintiffs reached the Defendant on November 27, 2014. E. The Defendant occupied, uses, and benefits from each of the instant buildings until the date of closing the argument after receiving delivery of each of the instant leased buildings from the Plaintiffs.

2. Determination as to the cause of action

A. According to the fact that each of the leased buildings of this case is recognized as the duty to deliver, this case.