logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 군산지원 2013.10.02 2013고단799
폭력행위등처벌에관한법률위반(공동상해)
Text

Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, 50.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

A is a convenience store, Defendant B is a person engaged in self-business, and a person who is punished.

On April 21, 2013, around 22:00, the Defendants expressed alcohol to G (the male, the age of 18) who is a minor person within the following convenience points: (a) Defendant A, on the two hand floor of the victim, set up approximately 30 times the victim’s knives, twice the part of the victim’s knives, and the Defendant B, together with it, set the victim’s knives over the floor by putting the dub and the head knives of the victim.

As a result, the Defendants jointly conducted the pain of the mouths that are not classified differently for about four weeks of treatment, damage to the reputation of the detailed unexploded face, spambling, sponsing, sponsing, etc. in the oral mouths requiring approximately two weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to each investigation report (cases accompanied by a medical certificate);

1. Relevant Article 2 (2) and (1) 3 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the defendants who choose to commit a crime;

1. Defendants of detention in a workhouse: Articles 70 and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: Although they have the same force to the Defendants for the reasons of sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, the Defendants are divided into depths, and the victims are paid KRW 10 million to the victims and the victims do not want the punishment of the Defendants. Defendant A did not have a criminal record of imprisonment without prison labor or more, and Defendant B did not have a minor degree of participation.

arrow