A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 25, 2009, the Defendant is a person who has the record of being issued a summary order of KRW 1 million for a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act at the Seoul Central District Court on February 25, 2009, and a fine of KRW 1.5 million for the same crime at the same court on September 4, 2012.

On August 15, 2017, around 02:55, the Defendant driven a Nra car while under the influence of alcohol with approximately 0.074% alcohol concentration in blood without obtaining a driver’s license from a section of approximately 100 meters in front of the front road in the Dong of the Gyeonggi-gu, Gyeonggi-gu, the Gyeonggi-do, the Gyeonggi-gu, the Gyeonggi-gu, the Gyeonggi-do, to the front road in the same Dong from the front road to the front road in the same Dong.

2. When the Defendant violated the Resident Registration Act was discovered to be suspected of driving alcohol at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) and informed the police officer Q of his personal information, the Defendant: (a) provided “S” to another person’s resident registration number to conceal his/her number of times; (b) but, in the event that it was discovered that other person’s resident registration number was inappropriate due to his/her photograph and fingerprint number; (c) returned another person’s resident registration number to the police officer; and (d) confirmed that his/her photograph and fingerprint were false and confirmed to have his/her photograph and fingerprinted; and (d) sent another person’s resident registration number “W” to the police officer.

3. The Defendant: (a) arrested a flagrant offender at the time and place specified in paragraph (1) of this Article as a crime of violating the Road Traffic Act (driving) at the time and place; and (b) requested a slope P and Qel who belongs to the Southern Police Station of the Suwon Police Station to collect blood from the Defendant; (c) stated the name of “V” in the consent and confirmation letter of blood collection kept therein; and (d) presented it to P, etc. as if it was a document duly formed.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged the consent to collect blood in the name of V, which is a private document on the proof of fact, and exercised it.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;