beta본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.10.25 2016가단145745
리스금
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The Defendant: (a) to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff, KRW 106,199,293; and (b) to this effect, April 2016.
Reasons
1. Determination as to the claim of the Plaintiff’s succeeding intervenor
(a) the reasons for the attachment to the indication of the claim and the reasons for participation in the application for intervention in succession;
(However, ‘creditor' is considered as ‘Plaintiff', and ‘debtor' as ‘Defendant').
Article 208 (3) 1 of the Civil Procedure Act)
2. The Plaintiff’s claim is dismissed, since the Plaintiff transferred the instant lease fee claim to the Intervenor succeeding to the Plaintiff during the proceeding of the instant lawsuit.