logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2020.02.06 2018가합52136
계약금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. A regional housing association promotion committee is an organization organized in order to promote the establishment, etc. of a regional housing association that implements a new project to build D apartment (hereinafter “instant apartment”) in the House C in the Gu Government-si (hereinafter “instant apartment”). On January 30, 2019, the Defendant comprehensively succeeded to the rights and obligations of the said promotion committee by obtaining authorization for the establishment of a housing association from the government market.

(hereinafter the above promotion committee and the defendant collectively referred to as "the defendant association"). B

Around October 26, 2016, the Defendant Union concluded an agency business service agreement with E (hereinafter referred to as “E”) that entrusts the instant project promotion to E (hereinafter referred to as “E”).

Among the above agency service contracts, the main contents related to the division of duties between the defendant union and E shall be as follows:

Article 3 (Sharing of Duties) of the agency service contract

2. The Defendant Union shall faithfully:

1) Designation of the project implementer on the land of the Defendant Union and provision of the project site; 2) Recruitment of members (hereinafter omitted)

3.E shall, upon delegation of the work of the Defendant Union under paragraph 2, faithfully:

8) Comprehensive business support related to the business affairs of the Defendant Union, determination of supply prices, sale in lots and advertisement 9) M/H establishment and implementation of plans, such as establishment and operation of and advertisement for M/H, management of subscribers (members), consultation, notification, etc. (hereinafter omitted)

C. On December 26, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into an agreement to enter the association (Evidence No. 1; hereinafter “instant agreement to enter the association”) under which the Defendant Association would visit the instant apartment sales center in the form of model Haba in F, the Government-si, and would purchase G (59m2) out of the instant apartment.

On the same day, the Plaintiff remitted KRW 5,000,000 for the first payment among the down payment (including business promotion expenses) to the H Co., Ltd. account designated by the Defendant Cooperative, and the down payment to the same account on January 3, 2017.

arrow