logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울행정법원 2016.08.26 2015구단1857
국가유공자등록거부처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On September 1, 1969, the Plaintiff joined the Marine Corps and was discharged from military service on April 1, 1970 through May 21, 1971 after the Vietnam War was discharged from military service on March 31, 1972.

B. On December 6, 2010, the Plaintiff: “Around August 1970, the Plaintiff was affiliated with the first unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the second unit of the military unit of the second unit of the military unit of the

“The Defendant filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State by making the difference in the application to the right angle. However, on April 14, 2011, the Defendant rejected the application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that there was no record of hospitalization, etc. received from the Plaintiff, and thus, the injury cannot be recognized as an injury during combat. (c) On February 13, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an application for registration of a person of distinguished service to the State on the ground that he/she cannot be recognized as a person of distinguished service to the State during combat. On February 13, 2014, the Plaintiff again belonged to the Defendant on April 13, 1970, when he/she was in operation at the May 13, 1970, and was in attacked by the enemy in his/her first place while moving to the welfare at night, and received the attack from the enemy in his/her right angle and the bones of sublim.”

On May 14, 2014, the Defendant rendered a decision that the instant injury was not recognized as a wound that constituted the requirements of Article 4(1)4 of the Act on the Honorable Treatment and Support of Persons, etc. of Distinguished Services to the State (hereinafter “Act”) to the Plaintiff, in accordance with the deliberation and resolution of the Board of Patriots and Veterans (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

E. On July 23, 2014, the Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal against the instant disposition. However, the Central Administrative Appeals Commission filed a request by the Plaintiff on November 11, 2014.

arrow