1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited in the judgment of the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where the part of the plaintiff's assertion (from 6th to 8th 15th ) among the provisions of paragraph (b) is deleted, and the part of the plaintiff's assertion (from 6th 8 to 15th ) is used as follows.

The plaintiff asserts as follows. The scheduled date of the inspection of the use of the apartment of this case was July 31, 2006, and Article 20 of the terms of the business agreement must undergo the inspection when the defendant completed the substantial construction. The inspection of the use of this case was completed on January 4, 2007 after the defendant recognized the corrective order of the voice Gun as all and completed the corrective order, and was issued on March 13, 2008. The contract of this case cannot be deemed to have been completed by the contract itself with the defendant obtained the approval of provisional use on August 1, 2006, and the contract of this case was rescinded on February 9, 207. The defendant should pay at least KRW 10 from July 31, 2006 to March 13, 2008, or at least from September 8, 2006 to March 208, 2006 to March 105, 2008.

2. Conclusion, the first instance judgment is justifiable.

The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.