logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2019.10.31 2019나2033270
지급금반환
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance concerning this case is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for modification as follows. Thus, this case is quoted pursuant to Article 420 of the Civil Procedure

(A) If the Plaintiff’s assertion and evidence submitted by this Court are examined, the fact-finding and judgment by the first instance court is reasonable). If the second and seventh parts of the first instance judgment were to be modified into “a corrected mine”, the part regarding “abstination of articles

Part II of the judgment of the first instance shall be amended to "I, J, and K" to "F, G, and H" in Part II.

Part 4 of the first instance judgment No. 16 of the 16th sentence " alone" shall be amended to "the above mermos and evidence No. 21 of the above mermos and evidence No. 21 (L) alone."

In full view of the facts found in the first instance judgment No. 5, the part of the first instance judgment’s “assumptively examining the evidence submitted by the Plaintiff to this court in light of the above-mentioned facts and the circumstances surrounding the assertion,” shall be amended to “assumed

2. Conclusion, the judgment of the court of first instance is justifiable, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

(In light of the above circumstances, even if the reference materials submitted by the Plaintiff to this court on October 15, 2019 after the closing of argument in this Court are considered, it is difficult to reverse the above judgment).

arrow