logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.08.24 2015가단135744
부당이득금
Text

1. The plaintiff's claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff is a housing redevelopment and rearrangement project partnership that obtained an authorization for the establishment of the association from the head of Seongdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government on May 18, 2006 pursuant to the Act on the Maintenance and Improvement of Urban Areas and Dwelling Conditions for Residents (hereinafter “Urban Improvement Act”) in order to implement the housing redevelopment and rearrangement project (hereinafter “instant redevelopment project”) for the housing redevelopment and rearrangement project for the 12-37 commercial zone in Seongdong-gu Seoul,

(1) On March 19, 2014, the contract price of 1 1.3.3. Management of facilities 8,00,000 won on March 17, 2014; 2,00,000 won for union members on November 10, 2014; 3,40,000 won for the general assembly head, and access control, etc. on November 20, 2014; 3.30,000 won for 1.30,000 won for the general assembly head, 30,000 won for 1.30,000 won for 20,000 won for 20.3. 0,000 won for the general assembly head, 30,000 won for the personal protection of union members and 1.3. 5,000 won for the personal protection of union members, 20,0000 won for 20,0000 won for the general assembly head, 3. 15.

B. From November 1, 2013 to January 13, 2015, the Defendants concluded each service contract for the instant redevelopment project (hereinafter “instant service contract”) with the Plaintiff as follows, and received full payment from the Plaintiff upon completion of each service contract.

[Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 2, 3, Gap evidence 1, 12, Eul evidence 1, Eul evidence 6, 7, Eul evidence 9 (including provisional number), the purport of the whole pleadings]

2. Determination

A. (1) The judgment on the cause of the claim (1) The Plaintiff shall be based on Article 24(3)5 of the Urban Improvement Act, and the Plaintiff’s articles of incorporation.

arrow