The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below on the gist of the reasons for appeal (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The following facts are the circumstances favorable to the Defendant: (a) the Defendant recognized the instant crime; (b) there is no record of the same kind of crime; (c) there is no record of criminal punishment except for the punishment of fines for the crime of double-class crimes; and (d) supporting two young children.

However, the crime of this case is merely an exercise of planned power by private retaliation appraisal, and it is difficult to consider the reason for the crime of this case's assertion in favor of the defendant, and actively agreed with the victim, since it is merely an exercise of planned power by private retaliation appraisal, it is hard to consider the reason for the crime of this case's assertion in favor of the defendant, since it is hard to consider the reason for the crime of this case's assertion as favorable to the defendant, and it is hard to see that the victim actively agreed with the victim.

In full view of all the sentencing conditions, including the Defendant’s age, sex, environment, family relationship, motive, and circumstances after the crime, it is difficult to see that the Defendant’s punishment is too unfair because it was too unreasonable, and the Defendant’s assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.