logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2017.01.13 2016구합22652
정보공개거부처분취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On October 29, 2015, the Plaintiff, a member of the National Democratic Government Officials’ Union, filed a claim against the Defendant for disclosure of the information on the current status of probation, including “the instant information” with the Defendant’s public official B (Korean Public Officials’ Union C, which belongs to the Defendant from March 2014 to January 2016)’s “2014-2015-2015-205-200,000: (a) official leave; (b) leave; (c) leave; (d) sick; (d) leave; and (e) outing.

B. On November 6, 2015, the Defendant rendered a non-disclosure decision (hereinafter “instant disposition”) on the ground that the instant information constitutes “information that is likely to infringe on privacy if disclosed,” and constitutes “non-disclosure information” under Article 9(1)6 of the Official Information Disclosure Act (hereinafter “Information Disclosure Act”).

C. The Plaintiff filed an administrative appeal with the Central Administrative Appeals Commission, but the Central Administrative Appeals Commission (the Central Administrative Appeals Commission) on May 17, 2016 is an information that could infringe on an individual’s privacy or freedom and that is not more than the interests protected by non-disclosure.

‘The plaintiff's appeal was dismissed on the ground of ‘the reason.'

On the other hand, the plaintiff requested the disclosure of information on the details of leave and the status of probation of executive officers who are public officials belonging to the Korean Public Officials' Union throughout the country. The following cases are confirmed.

Although the number of annual annual annual use days of the headquarters 1 in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, only the number of annual use days of the request of the plaintiff 2-2 of the request of the request of the plaintiff 1 to disclose the information of KRW 4 Gangwon-do, the request of the plaintiff 5 of the dismissal of the request of the plaintiff 1 to disclose the information of KRW 5 Chungcheongnam-do, the request of the plaintiff 1 to disclose the information of KRW 6 Chungcheongbuk-do, 7 Busan Busan Busan Metropolitan City Administrative Appeals Commission for the partial disclosure decision of KRW 9 U.S., the partial disclosure decision was made by the administrative appeals commission of

arrow