beta
Text
The Defendants are not guilty. The summary of the judgment against the Defendants is published.
Reasons
1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is the owner of the E apartment A Dong 1302 in Gwangjin-gu, Seoul, and the victim F is the person having chonsegwon residing in the said apartment. The above defendant and the victim had a mutual dispute as to the validity of the lease contract.
On August 1, 2012, at around 23:25, the Defendants: (a) made several contacts with the victim to talk about the leasing contract of the said apartment; (b) opened the apartment entrance and opened the entrance door to the front door of the victim’s office, and opened the door door to the front door of the victim’s office. On August 1, 2012, at around 23:25, the Defendants: (c) opened the door to the front door; (d) opened the door to the front door of the victim’s office; (e) opened the door to the front door; but (e) reported the Defendants, “I am out of clothes,” but, as they were, entered the dwelling room.
Accordingly, the Defendants jointly intruded upon the victim’s residence.
2. As to the facts charged of this case, the Defendants and the defense counsel entered the apartment of this case with the consent of the victim F from the investigation agency to the investigation agency, and entered the apartment of this case and entered the apartment of this case as a lease contract issue, and entered the above apartment of this case or entered or withdrawn
It asserts that there was no hearing received.
The evidence consistent with the facts charged in the instant case is practically the only statement at F’s police station. The F opened a door to the Defendants, or said that it was a son of the delivery company’s employee to mislead the Defendants, and that she immediately entered her clothes, and that Defendant A was the owner of the instant apartment, even if she was the owner of the instant apartment.
However, according to the records, including records, at the time of the submission by the Defendants, Defendant A and B, prior to the occurrence of this case, are the apartment of this case even on July 4, 2012.