1. The Defendant: 5% per annum from July 27, 2017 to April 13, 2018 for the Plaintiff and the following:

1. Basic facts

A. On January 21, 2016, the deceased C died, and the deceased’s children include her son, Defendant and D, E, F, and G.

B. On October 22, 2010, the Deceased prepared a testamentary document stating that “A person who died of his/her body shall grant (he/she shall inherit) the house he/she died to the Defendant,” and on June 27, 2016, a written protocol of inspection of the testamentary document No. 20138, Jun. 27, 2016 was prepared with respect to the above testamentary document.

C. On November 20, 2017, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer based on testamentary gift on January 21, 2016 regarding H land and its ground buildings in Jung-gu, Incheon (hereinafter collectively including the above land and buildings).

[Based on Recognition] Gap evidence 1, 2, 3 (including paper numbers), Eul evidence 8-2, Eul evidence 11-1, 2

2. Assertion and determination

A. The Plaintiff asserted that the deceased bequeathed the instant real estate to the Defendant and infringed the Plaintiff’s legal reserve of inheritance.

Therefore, the defendant should pay 33 million won to the plaintiff with the return of legal reserve of inheritance.

B. According to Article 1113(1) of the Civil Act, legal reserve of inheritance shall be calculated by adding the value of the property at the time of the commencement of the inheritance of the inheritee to the value of the property at the time of the commencement of the inheritance, and

따라서 원고의 유류분 부족액은 유류분 산정의 기초재산액에 원고의 유류분을 곱한 금액에서 원고의 특별 수익분을 공제한 다음 다시 그 금액에서 원고의 순상속분액을 공제한 금액이 된다[원고의 유류분 부족액 = {(유류분 산정의 기초재산액 × 원고의 유류분 비율) - 원고의 특별 수익액} - 원고의 순상속분액]. ⑴ 유류분 산정의 기초가 되는 재산액 ㈎ 망인 소유 재산 망인이 이 사건 부동산을 피고에게 유증한 사실은 앞서 본 바와 같고, 망인의 사망 당시 이 사건 부동산의 시가가 4억 원인 사실은 당사자 사이에 다툼이 없다.

㈏ 증여재산 유무 한편 피고는 망인이...