(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2019.09.06 2019고단1391

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 광주지방법원 순천지원 2019.09.06 2019고단1391

교통사고처리특례법위반(치사)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 10 million.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of B 2 cargo vehicles.

On May 13, 2019, the Defendant driven the 19:35 Franchising of the 19:35 Franchising of the Franchising Line, and instead neglected to observe the duty of front-time watch and the duty of safety distance on the surface of the land from the old-gu Eup to the non-speed speed of the land, and transferred the flachising Line to the center line near the flachising Line by shocking the back portion of the flachis driven by the victim D (Nam, 85 years old) who is driving in the front.

On May 15, 2019, the Defendant caused the death of the victim due to multi-lateral injury while receiving treatment at a pre-nam University Hospital located in 42, Dong-gu, Gwangju, Dong-gu, 2019, by occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on internal investigation (Attachment of a report on internal investigation) and a report on internal investigation (Attachment of a report on death of a deceased person);

1. Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Special Cases concerning the Selection of Punishment, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the selection of fines;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Circumstances unfavorable to the reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order: The court shall determine the punishment as ordered in consideration of all the sentencing conditions shown in the arguments of this case, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, environment, criminal record relationship, circumstances after the crime, etc., and all of the sentencing conditions indicated in the arguments of this case, such as the fact that the defendant's negligence appears to be against the victim's death, which is the most favorable result: the victim's bereaved family members and the victim's bereaved family members have agreed smoothly; that there is no record of criminal punishment except for the punishment of

참조조문

유사 판례

-광주지방법원 2014.10.15 2014고단2741

-광주지방법원 장흥지원 2014.10.30 2014고단115

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2021.03.25 2020고단2896

-광주지방법원 2014.09.25 2014고단2289

-광주지방법원 순천지원 2016.11.02 2016고단1571