1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 29, 2014, the Plaintiff filed a motion with the Intellectual Property Tribunal to confirm the scope of the right of the instant Claim 1 (2014Da1254) that “the instant invention subject to confirmation falls under the scope of the right of the instant Claim 1,” and argued that each composition of the instant invention subject to confirmation is substantially identical to that of the instant invention as described in Claim 1 of the instant patent invention (hereinafter “instant Claim 1,” and the remainder of the claims are described in the same manner) and that the same effect is also the same. (2) On October 20, 2014, the Intellectual Property Tribunal rejected the Plaintiff’s petition on the ground that the instant invention subject to confirmation and the instant Claim 1 invention are not included in the scope of the right of the instant Claim 1.

B. The Plaintiff’s title of the patented invention (A No. 3) 1: B) the filing date/application number of the patent: C/D3: the patent registration date/registration number: E/F4 of the patented invention of this case is related to the cargo loading box that allows loading or unloading of heavy equipment using a cargo box without using a separate bridge, etc. when loading or unloading of a cargo vehicle.

(Identification Number (001). Cargo Trackets consisting of loading or unloading of existing equipment, there were inconveniences that people face, lacing or cutting off, or that people face, lacing or fixing, with hand, heavy equipment.

(Personal Identification Numbers [007] and [008]. The patented invention of this case is one of the devices to ensure that the patented invention of this case automatically engages in or contact with the patented invention of this case in order to solve the above problems, and that the patented invention of this case can be manufactured by two parallels and loaded or unloaded medium equipment safely.