1. According to the amendment of the purport of the claim in the trial, the judgment of the first instance is modified as follows.

Defendant B, a limited liability company.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties in Gwangju-gu Officetel (hereinafter “instant building”) is a building constructed with the second and fifteen stories underground and the fifteen stories above the ground, which consists of a commercial building with the first floor above the ground level, and a residential officetel from the second to the fifteenth floor above the ground level.

The Plaintiff (Appointed Party, hereinafter “Plaintiff”) and the designated parties are the owners of residential officetels among the instant buildings, and the Defendant Limited Company B (hereinafter “Defendant B”) are the owners of 101, 102, and 103 stores on the first floor of the instant building (hereinafter “101, 102, and 103”) and Defendant C’s law firm (hereinafter “Defendant C”) leased Nos. 101, 102, and 103 from Defendant B on October 29, 2014 and operated the law office. Defendant D is the juristic person operating the law office under subparagraphs 101, 102, and 102, and Defendant C’s office from Defendant C on December 6, 2014.

B. (1) The Defendants’ entrance entrance building was built around September 29, 2006, and the front and part of the first floor, which was the outer wall of Nos. 101, 102, and 103 at the time, had been built of a glass wall and a tiny wall, and the entrance was not installed on the said glass wall and the tiny wall.

(2) After the lease of Nos. 101 and 102 and the lease of Defendant D had the front of 103, Defendant C arbitrarily changed the glass wall and the front of 102 and the front of 103, with the permission of Defendant B, and Defendant C has installed and used a entrance on the line connecting each point of 102, 1, 2, 2, 103, 3, 4, on the line connecting each point of 102, 102, 102.

In total, "each of the above doors" shall be "each of the doors of this case".

(ii) [In the absence of dispute over the basis of recognition, Gap evidence 1, 2, 4, Eul evidence 1 to 4, Eul evidence 7, 8, and 10, each entry and video, and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. Defendant C and D asserted by the Plaintiff constitute 102, 103.