The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged in the instant case is that Defendant A did not know at all with the garment store employee and the victim B.

On March 11, 2014, around 00:20, in the Government City C, the business owners and the victim recommended the defendant A, who was under the influence of alcohol, to invalid within D frequency.

Then, he assaulted the face with the hand-to-face of the vehicle by walking the line on a hand-to-face of his own.

2. The crime of assaulting on the market is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records of trial of this case, the facts can be acknowledged on March 31, 2014 that the victim expressed his/her intention not to be punished against the defendant on the ground that the prosecution of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparag. 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act