1. The Defendant indicated the attached Form 2 drawings on the Plaintiff (Appointed Party), the Appointed Party C, and D, among the land size 41,213 square meters of forest E in the Gannam-gun.

In full view of the purport of the pleadings as a result of the request for the measurement and appraisal of evidence Nos. 1 and 3 and the purport of the entire arguments with respect to the head of the Korea Land Information Corporation in this Court, the following facts are as follows: (a) the Plaintiff (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties C, and D are owners of 41,213 square meters of forest E-forest in Gyeongnam-gun, Gyeongnam-gun; and (b) the Defendant, who successively connected each point of (b) the attached Table Nos. 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, and 38 of the attached Table Nos. 2, which are attached in sequence connected with each point of (b) the table Nos. 34, 35, 36, 37, and 34 of the above drawings; and (c) the Defendant has the obligation to perform the above excavation to the Plaintiff.

(A) The Defendant asserted that the four period of the said grave was installed on the land of 6,327 square meters of forest land and 119 square meters of forest land owned by the Defendant, and did not interfere with the said E forest. However, the Defendant asserted that the Korea Land Information Corporation branch erroneously surveyed the said land. However, the evidence submitted by the Defendant alone is insufficient to recognize that the said four period of the grave was installed on the land of forest land and G forest land, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it. Accordingly, the Plaintiff’s claim is reasonable, and thus, it is so decided as per Disposition.