The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (six months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances favorable to the Defendant include the fact that the Defendant recognized and reflected his mistake, the driving distance is short in the instant crime, and no additional traffic accident occurs.

However, the crime of this case causes danger to traffic by driving a vehicle under the influence of alcohol concentration of 0.182% while the license of the defendant was revoked due to driving under the influence of alcohol. In light of the circumstances and the degree of driving, etc. of the crime, there are not only a number of criminal records such as the nature of the crime, one time to suspend the execution of the same crime, and six times to a fine. The crime of this case committed again for a period of three years to a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for a traffic accident after causing a traffic accident while driving without a license, and again committed the crime of this case while being sentenced to a fine again during the suspended sentence of one year. The current Road Traffic Act stipulates that the prohibition clause of driving under the influence of alcohol is more severe punishment when driving under the influence of alcohol more than twice, and the defendant's age, character, circumstances, motive and circumstances before and after the crime of this case, as well as other circumstances that are disadvantageous to the defendant, and it is not recognized that the court below's sentencing of this case is unfair.

3. The defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.