Defendant shall be punished by imprisonment without prison labor for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant is a person engaged in driving CK5 taxis.

On January 28, 2016, the Defendant driven the above taxi on January 18, 2016, and proceeded ahead of the Mat in Yeonsu-gu Incheon Metropolitan City, with the speed from the educational distance of the audience to the Yongsan Park.

Since a crosswalk is installed on the front side, in such a case, there was a duty of care to check whether a person engaged in driving service is a person who renders a way to reduce the speed and to see well the right and the right and the right and the right of the road, and to safely drive the road.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to do so and negligently received the victim G (56 years old) such as the victim F (Woo, 58 years old) who walked along the crosswalk due to negligence, and received the victim G (Woo, 56 years old) from the front part of the vehicle under the influence of the victim.

As a result, the Defendant suffered, from the above occupational negligence, the victim F, the injury to the victim F, such as the frame of the shoulder pelel pelel, which requires approximately 6 weeks of treatment, and the victim G, who suffered from the injury, such as the right pelle pelle pelle on the left side of the border, which requires approximately 8 weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A written statement of F and G;

1. A survey report on actual conditions;

1. Each and medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes governing accidents;

1. Each relevant legal provision of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) 6 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Concurrent Crimes (the punishment provided for in the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents against G with a more severe criminal situation)

1. Selection of a credit cooperative without prison labor for punishment;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following extenuating circumstances in favor of the reasons for sentencing);

1. The reason for sentencing under Article 62-2(1) of the Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of the Order to Attend, the Defendant committed the instant crime even though he had the record of two identical crimes. The Defendant violated the duty to protect pedestrians who walk along the crosswalk while driving this vehicle.