Defendants shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the Defendants are above two years from the date of the final judgment.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendants, who are female students, E (personally unspecified matters), and E, who have come to know through Internet hosting, conduct sexual traffic as if they were engaged in sexual traffic, and receive the payment of sexual traffic after entering the telecom, shall inform the Defendants and D, who are waiting outside the telecom, of such fact, and the Defendants and D are waiting outside the telecom, in contact with E.

Along with E E's pro-Japanese, there was an invitation to take part in the role of threatening male sexual traffic as if they were reported to the police.

1. The Defendants, D, and E conspired as above in collusion with the said Defendants at around 03:30 on November 30, 2016, at around 205 the “G” telecom 205, the Defendants and D waiting outside the said telecom, and entering the said telecom with the victims of sexual traffic, which was a male victim H, who became aware of through Internet hosting, and then entered the said telecom. Despite the fact that they did not think of engaging in commercial sex acts, they did not think of engaging in commercial sex acts, and they were delivered KRW 200,000 as the price for commercial sex acts from the victims.

2. Defendants of violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint intimidation) and D, and E, at the time and place described in paragraph 1, they inform the Defendants and D of the fact that they want to receive sexual traffic payments from the victims of sexual traffic, and they inform the Defendants and D, waiting outside the telecom, the Defendant and D, who was contacted by E, enter the telecom, as if they were to photograph the video with the cell phone, and the Defendant A was able to do so with the cell phone. D is the victim “Chewing fark,” and the victim was the victim, who was sexually abused.

Magbin flaps shackers

Reported to the police

The defendant B was frighted, and the defendant B went out of the telecom.

Accordingly, Defendants, D, and E jointly threatened victims.

3. The Defendant A, at around November 30, 2016, shall be as above, at the front of the above telecom.