beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 44,606,59 as well as the Plaintiff’s KRW 5% per annum from May 5, 2016 to July 16, 2020 and from July 17, 2020.
Reasons
1. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. A. On January 23, 2016, the Plaintiff entered into a labor contract with the Defendant and the Defendant, on the land of Busan Dong-dong, Busan, where the Defendant was under construction, to work as the steel bars of the construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the new construction of the 13th floor above the 13th floor above the ground surface above the 13th floor above the ground, and the period of such employment was agreed on may November 23, 2016. 2) around May 5, 2016, at the construction site of the above construction site, a strupt was installed up to the 8th floor at the building site, and a space of 60-70 cm between the frupt and the wall was installed, and the Plaintiff was put into the inner wall of the parking lot work at around 7th floor on the same day.
3) The said steel-line work is ordinarily carried out in a way that the Plaintiff is engaged in the freshing work with a diameter of 19 meters and a diameter of 5 meters in length, which was ordinarily set up on the ground, transported to 7th floor slabs, and a steel-line with a diameter of 19 meters and a diameter of 5 meters in length, and the Plaintiff is engaged in the freshing work with a diameter of 5 meters. The Plaintiff, while putting up a steel-line for the freshing work at that time, falls into a freshing with a space between fred and a wall (hereinafter “instant accident”).
As a result, the plaintiff suffered from the release frame of the 1st century.
B. According to the above facts of recognition of liability, the accident of this case occurred by negligence of the defendant who did not install a solid house without scambing the scambling, and thus, the defendant is liable to compensate the plaintiff for the damages caused by the
However, even as a skilled Plaintiff, he did not comply with the duty of care to verify and check whether a frush has been firmly installed for his own safety, while working on the 7th floor height, and such mistake is also the cause of the occurrence of the instant accident and the expansion of damages, and thus, the Defendant’s responsibility is limited to 70% for the fair sharing of damages.