Defendant

A shall be punished by a fine of 300,000 won.

Defendant

If A does not pay the above fine, 100.

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

At around 09:00 on October 16, 2013, A demanded that “the construction materials loaded on the ground” be stored, and Defendant B “the ground 40-50cm in length” was expressed as to whether “the ground flabed on the ground flab,” and “the ground flabed on the ground flab,” and “the flabing flab,” which was used by Defendant B’s hand, inflicted injury on Defendant B, such as flabeds, flabs, and flabs, which require medical treatment for about 14 days by means of killing flabing the flab, etc.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant A’s legal statement

1. The suspect interrogation protocol of Defendant B concerning the police officer

1. Application of the injury diagnosis certificate and the Chatra statute;

1. Relevant Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of a fine, and the choice of a fine;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The dismissal part of the prosecution under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act

1. The summary of the facts charged was assaulted by the Defendant A, as described in the above facts charged, and the Defendant A assaulted the Defendant A, against this defense, such as cutting down the flaps of the Defendant A and cutting down the flaps.

2. In light of the judgment, this case is a crime falling under Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 260(3) of the Criminal Act. According to the records of the instant case’s trial, it can be acknowledged that the victim expressed his/her wish not to punish the defendant on December 30, 2013, which is after the prosecution of the instant case. Thus, the instant prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327(6) of the Criminal Procedure Act.

It is so decided as per Disposition for the above reasons.