beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. C, married with D on August 4, 1936, had children under the Sslova, E, F, Plaintiff, G, his wife, H, I, J, and K, died on July 27, 1992, and D, its wife, died on January 6, 2003.
B. On September 15, 1999, the Defendant completed the registration of transfer on the ground of inheritance on July 27, 1992 with respect to the land of 2,208 square meters and land of Ma 3,649 square meters, which was owned by C, on September 15, 199, for the land of 2,208 square meters and land of 3,649 square meters. On May 31, 2004, the land listed in paragraph (1) of the attached Table was transferred 22 square meters to Gosung-gun, Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-do, and the land listed in paragraph (2) of the attached Table was transferred to the Gyeong-gun, Gyeong-do, Gyeong-do, Gyeong-do, and the land of 404 square meters and land of 3,649 square meters was transferred to the Gyeong-do, Sung-do, Sung-do, and the land indicated in paragraph (2) of the attached Table.
(hereinafter referred to as “each of the instant lands”. 【The grounds for recognition】 Evidence Nos. 1 (including paper numbers) and 3-1 of the Evidence Nos. 3-1, and the purport of the entire pleadings.
2. The parties' assertion and judgment
A. On September 15, 199, the title transfer registration was completed on September 15, 199, and is managed by the Plaintiff, who is the head of the Nam-gun, and the heir including the Plaintiff and the Defendant agreed to pay the price for disposal of the above inherited property or to complete the registration of transfer of ownership in accordance with the inheritance shares, and the Defendant completed the registration of transfer of ownership for each of the above land as a result of inheritance due to the agreement division.
However, even if the Defendant disposed of 658 square meters, Q 1,183 square meters in Gyeong-gun Pak-gun, Chungcheongnam-do on March 29, 2013, the Defendant did not pay the amount equivalent to the inheritance shares to siblings including the Plaintiff. As such, the Plaintiff is an inherited property against the Defendant.