beta
Text
All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.
Reasons
1. Facts charged;
A. Defendant B is a spouse who has completed a marriage report with E on January 21, 1988.
(1) On April 2012, the Defendant passed a single sexual intercourse with A at the mother telecom where the trade name in Gwangju City F is unknown.
(2) On December 2013, 2013, the Defendant had a sexual intercourse with A and a single sexual intercourse at the house of Seongbuk-gu Seoul Special Metropolitan City, Seongbuk-gu, 201.
B. Defendant A was aware that he was a spouse of the above B, and the two times of sexual intercourses with B as prescribed in paragraph (1).
2. Inasmuch as the instant public prosecution that was dismissed on March 5, 2015 was revoked on March 5, 2015, it is so decided as per Disposition pursuant to Article 328(1)1 of the Criminal Procedure Act.
March 11, 2015