logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2018.09.20 2018고단2995
위증교사
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for six months, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Records] Defendant A was sentenced to two years of imprisonment for a violation of the Narcotics Control Act at the Daegu District Court on June 2, 2017, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on October 31, 2017.

Defendant

B On June 2, 2017, the Daegu District Court sentenced a suspended sentence of two years in September 16, 2017 for a violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. at the Daegu District Court, which became final and conclusive on September 16, 2017.

[Criminal facts]

1. Defendant A, at the Daegu District Court on June 2, 2017, was sentenced to two years of imprisonment with prison labor for committing an offense, such as “the delivery of the philophones to B on October 20, 2016 without compensation,” and was sentenced to the said B to have the Defendant give false testimony favorable to the Defendant.

From June 2017 to July 2017, the Defendant prepared a letter to the effect that “I wish to apply B as a witness at the appellate court in the Daegu Suwon-gu detention house, Daegu-gu, Daegu-gu, Dan, “I am to prove that B would bring about NaI-be narcotics instead of giving B narcotics to B,” and delivered the said letter to B through the high school-friendly job offers C.

Accordingly, B testified with the false testimony to the effect that “I will bring the inside of the Republic of Korea to the future, rather than receiving a phiphone from Defendant (A) at around October 201, 2016, at around 15:00 on August 25, 2017, as a witness of the Daegu District Court case No. 201, 2017, as a witness of the violation of the Act on the Control of Narcotics, etc. against Defendant A, No. 2469, the 2017 No. 2017, as a witness of the Daegu District Court Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Metropolitan City Special Act on the Control of Narcotics, Etc. (hereinafter referred to as “A”).

Accordingly, the defendant caused B to make a statement contrary to his memory and instigated the perjury.

2. Defendant B appeared as a witness in the case of violation of the Narcotics Control Act against Defendant A (No. 2017No. 2469), which was located in Daegu Suwon-gu, Daegu-gu, 364 on August 25, 2017, at the court of law No. 201, and from the presiding judge, the Defendant appeared as a witness in the case of violation of the Narcotics Control Act against Defendant A (No. 2469).

arrow