A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Criminal facts

On January 27, 2017, at around 20:40 on January 27, 2017, the Defendant heard that the Defendant was assaulted by the Defendant’s wife E to the victim F ( South, 29 years old) who is attending the school, and had the victim enter the Defendant’s residence, and the victim “NF has been well doing so.”

The phrase "I am the head of the victim's head and the head of the victim's head in his/her residence," and the second victim "I am the head of his/her father's son's son's son's head."

“Along with drinking, the victim’s head can be seen as having been cut back, and the victim’s body was cut back by breaking the body of the victim beyond the floor of the living room, and the victim’s face was cut back by using the driver’s head, which is a dangerous object, once and dangerous object, with the victim’s face.

The Defendant carried dangerous articles as above and carried the victim, thereby causing approximately three weeks of medical treatment to the victim. In addition, the Defendant carried the dangerous articles as above, and led the victim to an unabsparation of the body for treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of witness F;

1. A criminal investigation report and an investigation report (Attachment of suspect F images on the suspect F);

1. A medical certificate of injury (F), and a medical certificate (F);

1. Photographs of the upper part of the body (F, A);

1. 112 Application of Acts and subordinate statutes of Part V to the 112 Report processing statement;

1. Articles 258-2 (1) and 257 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the stay of execution (The following favorable circumstances required for the reasons for sentencing);

1. Article 62-2(1) of the Social Service Order Criminal Act and Article 59 of the Act on the Protection, Observation, etc. of Protection, etc., of the Defendant and his/her defense counsel asserted that although the Defendant and his/her defense counsel have abused the victim at the time and place in the ruling, the Defendant and his/her defense counsel did not assault the victim by citing an empty spawn or abruc

However, as stated in the judgment of the investigation agency and this court, the victim seems to have taken the face of the accused with an empty small-scale illness and taken the head into account as a telecom.