logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 성남지원 2017.06.14 2017고단1208
명예훼손
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. On February 25, 2015, the Defendant: (a) at the conference room for the representative of the occupants of the apartment complex B in Gwangju-si, Gwangju-si; (b) notwithstanding the fact that: (c) the victim C, a managing director, embezzled water rates or sold to another person a telephone machine used in the management office, the Defendant, on his/her own corruption, embezzled the water rates; and (d) publicly, he/she embezzled the water rates for the management of the apartment complex at approximately 20 persons, such as Da resident D, and stolen the telephone machine.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by sound.”

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act, and cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent under Article 312 of the Criminal Act.

However, according to the records of this case, the victim's withdrawal of complaint was submitted to the purport that the defendant does not want to be punished to this court on May 15, 2017, which was after prosecution, and the indictment of this case is dismissed pursuant to Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow