1. Defendant B and Defendant who ordered payment in excess of the following amount among the judgment of the first instance.

A principal lawsuit and a counterclaim shall be deemed simultaneously.

1. The reasoning for this part of the reasoning is as follows: (a) the reasoning for this part of the judgment of the court is as stated in the corresponding part of the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except where “E 1” as “as indicated in the attached list” as “as indicated in the attached list”; and (b) the reasoning for this part is cited pursuant to the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act

2. Determination as to the claim on the principal lawsuit

A. The reasoning for this part of the court’s liability for damages is as follows, except for the part of “(2) Plaintiff’s acquisition of the Plaintiff’s sound recording copyright” as indicated in Article 420(a) of the Civil Procedure Act, and thus, it is accepted by the main sentence of Article 420 of the reasoning of the judgment of the first instance. On the seventh day of the judgment of the first instance, “the Defendant” as indicated in the fifth to 8th day above is as follows. The Defendant asserted that “The Defendant’s right to the Plaintiff’s sound recording was divided into H around 1979, and transferred to G, a corporation established by changing the organization, but there is no sufficient evidence to acknowledge it. However, it is reasonable to view that the Plaintiff acquired the right to the Plaintiff’s sound recording as a producer of the sound recording around 1986, taking account of the general perception level of copyright in the 1980s.

A person shall be appointed.

나. 손해배상책임의 범위 1 재산적 손해 ㈎ 원고는 피고들의 원고 음반에 관한 권리 침해 행위로 인하여 피고들이 피고 음반의 매출액인 91,740,000원 상당의 이익을 얻었으므로 피고들이 공동하여 위 금원 상당액을 재산상 손해배상으로서 원고에게 지급하여야 한다고 주장한다.

㈏ 저작권법 제125조 제1항은 저작재산권을 가진 자가 고의 또는 과실로 권리를 침해한 자에 대하여 그 침해행위에 의하여 자기가 받은 손해의 배상을 청구하는 경우에 그 권리를 침해한 자가 그 침해행위에 의하여...