1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of the lawsuit, including the part resulting from the supplementary participation, are all assessed against the Plaintiff.

1. Details of decision on the petition examination;

A. On February 1, 2001, the Plaintiff, including the Plaintiff’s appointment process, was the name “H University” at the time of February 1, 2001, the C University D Campus (hereinafter “D Campus”) affiliated with the Intervenor.

An assistant professor was newly appointed, and was promoted to be a professor on January 1, 2011, and was employed as the head of D Campus regional university from March 1, 2012 to January 3, 2018.

(A) Evidence No. 1). (b)

1) On July 23, 2018, the Intervenor requested the Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee to “the Plaintiff’s Disciplinary Decision” on July 23, 2018. On July 26, 2018, the Teachers’ Disciplinary Committee partially revised and omitted entry in order to assist the Plaintiff in understanding of the following reasons. On the basis of the foregoing, the Defendant decided that the Plaintiff was suspended from office for three months (No. B. 16 evidence) (Provided, That as seen in paragraph (c) (i) of the same Article, the Defendant considered that “part of the grounds for the disciplinary action does not constitute a justifiable grounds for disciplinary action,” and emphasizes the bottom.

(2) In the event that the grounds for disciplinary action are specified (hereinafter referred to as the "grounds for disciplinary action"), the statement of the grounds for disciplinary action within the scope of the individual grounds for disciplinary action stated below shall be used.

(1) On August 25, 2017, when the Plaintiff was present at the management strategy meeting held in Seoul on August 25, 2017, the Plaintiff was deemed by the principal of the school group (E) to have reported the F professor’s sexual indecent act by mobile phone text and wire. On August 24, 2017, the Plaintiff was aware in advance of the instant case on the grounds that the Plaintiff, on August 24, 2017, talked about the sexual indecent act of F professor from female students suffering from the industry-academic concurrent position (such as G) and the written accusation prepared by the victimized female students.

At the time, the Plaintiff was fully aware of the methods of sexual harassment, such as sexual harassment and sexual harassment, and sexual harassment in the institution, by completing professional education, etc. for the prevention of sexual assault several times.