Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

1. The Defendant attempted to commit property damage or intrusion with the victim C on June 2, 2018, on the ground that the victim did not her/her/her/her/her/her her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/ her/

2. The Defendant interfered with the performance of official duties, on June 22, 2018, on the same facts as the foregoing paragraph 1, which was reported on June 22, 2018 and sent out by 112, and arrested the Defendant by the Chief F of the police station Edistrict belonging to the Seocheon-gu Northern Police Station, Seocheon-gu, North Korea, and brought the Defendant to the above Edistrict office, and then he saw the Defendant as seated in the f

Upon the request of “I”, I expressed the desire to “I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, I am, with the left hand, with the above part of F one-time hand.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate performance of official duties by police officers on the handling of 112 reporting duties and investigation of crimes.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with regard to F;

1. Written self-sufficiency in C and G;

1. 112 Reporting case handling table;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs damaged;

1. Article 136 (1) of the Criminal Act (the point of obstructing the performance of official duties), Article 366 of the Criminal Act (the point of destroying property), and Articles 322 and 319 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime (the point of attempted intrusion upon residence);

1. Articles 40 and 50 of the Criminal Act of the Commercial Competition;

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The Defendant, with the reason of sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, tried to intrude into the house of the victim, who was known to the Defendant, and damaged the knife in the process. Upon receiving a report, the police officer who was dispatched to the police, abused the police officer to interfere with the execution of his duties.

However, the defendant.