logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2017.05.31 2017고단969
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On March 22, 2017, the Defendant: (a) on March 22, 2017, on the street in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul, Seoul around 23:40, and reported on the 112-day driving accident; and (b) Seoul sent to the site after receiving an order to move on the road from police officers E belonging to Pyeongtaek Police Station D to ensure that there is a danger of accident; (c) the Defendant was instructed to move on the road.

“In doing a bath theory, the police officers flick E’s bat and flat E’s bat, and F, the police officers affiliated with D of the same police station, like E, intended to arrest the Defendant as a current offender interfering with the performance of official duties, and received f’s right face at one time as head.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with police officers' legitimate performance of official duties concerning traffic accident handling and arrest of flagrant offenders.

The defendant of "2017 Highest 1115" is a person who is engaged in driving a motor vehicle of Galburged G.

On March 22, 2017, the Defendant driven the said car under the influence of alcohol content of 0.183% in blood at around 23:30, while driving the said car along the same lane as one-lane in front of the I in Eunpyeong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government H in the direction of the long distance in the Gusan Station in the direction of the long distance, while entering the intersection, the Defendant was under the influence of the said car as the front part of the said car by occupational negligence, which was driven by the victim J-Ma (the age of 48) who was stopped on the road due to the failure to accurately operate the steering system and the brake system, while driving the said car along the same three-lane in the direction of the long distance in the Gusan Station.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury, such as salt, tension, etc., from the light that requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment due to occupational negligence as above.

Summary of Evidence

"2017 Highest 969"

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. Each police statement made to E and F;

1. "Audio 2017 high group of 1115" in an investigation report (record of a statement by a wooden tape);

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. J.

arrow