A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for one year from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

(e).

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who has served as a taxi engineer in the Fsidong in Chungcheongnam-gun E.

1. At around 11:00 on May 2012, the Defendant: (a) 11:00 on the ground that the victim G (hereinafter, 47 years of age) was in charge of accounting at the FF taxi office on the following grounds: (b) made the victim’s desire to make a wrong claim for taxi commission to the Defendant; (c) made the victim’s desire to do so; and (d) had the same attitude to keep the victim in drinking and drinking; and (d) continued to have the victim look back at the work place at that place; and (e) made the victim 10 minutes on the back of the victim’s shoulder; and (e) caused the victim’s failure to take all the steps to stop.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim and interfered with the above company accounting work by force.

2. At around 11:00 on October 2012, the Defendant, at the above FF taxi office around 11:00, she saw the victim as a matter of calculating the taxi commission, she was unable to avoid disturbance over about 20 minutes, such as: (a) she saw the victim as a matter of calculating the taxi commission; (b) she took a bath, such as “grasing the same year, chewing years, dead, and leaving the snow,” and (c) intending to gather the tools while keeping the tools in the said place.

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the above accounting work of the victim by force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to the police statement concerning G;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning the facts of crime and the point of obstructing each business of the choice of punishment: Violence under Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act: Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act (an aggravated punishment and concurrent crimes as provided for in the crime of interference with business on or before October 2012, which are the largest punishment and concurrent crimes);

1. As to the summary of the charges concerning the dismissal of public prosecution under Article 62(1) of the Criminal Act (i.e., Article 62(1) of the Act on the Suspension of Execution, and Article 62(1) of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes, the victim C is deemed to have committed a crime somewhat contingent