The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence imposed by the court below (three years of imprisonment) on the summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the defendant is favorable to the fact that he made confessions of all the crimes of this case and reflects the wrongness while committing the crime of this case; that the amount of 1 phiphones handled by the defendant is not much punished; that the defendant has not been punished for crimes related to narcotics; that the defendant fully repaid the amount of alcohol to the victim L; and that health is not good; however, the crime of this case related to the narcotics of this case is administered once by the defendant; that the defendant possesses 0.38 g of philophones for the purpose of delivering other narcotics-related crimes; that the defendant was taken over and possessed by the 14.61g of amlograms for the purpose of getting gains from transfer to another philophones; that, in light of the fact that the defendant was found to have been subject to a suspended sentence of imprisonment with prison labor for not less than 2 years, and that there is a high degree of harm to the defendant's exercise of his right to defense against the above crime of this case, and that the defendant might be deemed to have been subject to criminal punishment by the above 10 minutes or more.