beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for up to six months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment became final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
Telecommunications financial fraud (one-time Bosing) is an organized crime consisting of various stages of organization, such as “total liability” that plans and instructs a total crime, “locks by deceiving and threatening a victim,” “locks by deceiving and threatening a victim,” “locks by soliciting and delivering cash cards, cash accounts, etc.”, “locks by withdrawing or directly receiving the money transferred by the victims from the cash payment date,” “locks by receiving cash from the withdrawal date,” “locks by delivering cash to domestic or foreign total books,” and “locks by delivering deposited criminal proceeds”.
On November 29, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from a solicitation book on the name of the Defendant that “I would pay money for each case if I would like to transport money because customers make it difficult for them to pay money directly in the operation of gambling sites abroad;” and (b) accepted the proposal to help the Defendant even with knowledge that I would be able to commit the singing crime.
1. Around December 4, 2018, the Defendant was forced to prepare and deliver the victim’s 10 million won on the same day to the effect that the Defendant was able to have his/her son and son and son and son and son and son and son and son and son and son and son and son and son and son and son and son and son and son and son..............
At around 14:00 on December 4, 2018, the Defendant received an instruction from the above-mentioned solicitation policy, and received the victim's KRW 10,000 from the victim in front of the Diplomatic Association located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, and deposited the amount remaining after excluding KRW 500,000 as the fee with no passbook in an account.
2. Around December 4, 2018, the Defendant called the victim to provide the victim with a friendly guarantee, and the friendly Gu did not pay the friendly amount.