logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.07.24 2014가단5205907
구상금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 9,847,404 as well as 5% per annum from February 14, 2014 to July 24, 2015 to the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

(a) A A In the event of a traffic accident, around 05:50 on May 17, 2012, and around 05:50,000 Lone Star (B; hereinafter the same shall apply)

2) A driving on the 1st parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel group D, and E. 2) A was in a state of drinking (0.05% alcohol concentration in blood) by math parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel parallel line.

A, while talking in the seat next to a driver, he neglected his duty of care in the front place.

In the instant case, the passenger car, as shown in the attached Form, left several roads, and received the end portion of the protective fence installed on the road side, as it was cut off from the road.

3) Due to its shock, approximately nine meters of the protective fenced into the instant area by drilling the front side of the instant sponsing and leaving the front side. During that process, C died at C by shocking the trees of C, which the protective fence was in the front line. The driver and the remaining passengers died at C at the site. B. At the time of the accident, the road at the location of the instant accident (i.e., the condition of the installation of the protective fence) begins to the right side of the road facing the front side, and the right side of the road begins to prevent the straightened.

There is an excessive autopsy at the place where the protective fence of the accident site is terminated.

2) The protection fence of the instant case is a field outside of the flat. The protection fence of the instant case was installed for the purpose of preventing the escape from the vehicle, and preventing collision, etc. with the personnel working there from the red autopsy or its site at the time of leaving the vehicle. 3) The protection fence should be installed at a distance from the possible roadway. The desirable extension of the installation is 100 meters, and it must be at least 60 meters where the extension of the installation is inevitably reduced.

On the other hand, protection fences can be terminated.

arrow